No, flash player is better and faster.
Java and Flash Player are used for different purposes. They both have their advantages and disadvantages.
Java is not better than VBNet, nor is VBNet better than Java. Eachone has its advantages and disadvantaged over the other one.
Logically, you cannot play SWF files created for Flash Player 10 on Flash Player 9. So, I would have to say no... Flash Player 11 is better than both and any newer stable version keeps getting better and more essential to have.
If you need more than 2GB, 3GB is better.
I think oracle is better than Derby
This is only an opinion, but pivot is better than flash and 3.1 beta is the best version
Definitely an External hard disk is better than the flash memory because of it's stability.
This question makes no sense.
Beacuase Java's Concept is OOP object oriented programming and with grate feature include better then assembly lang.
I don't see any reason why they would be better.
No, :s
Because flash drives are plug and play devices