YES!
a job against animal cruelty is saving the animal and killing the person that hurt they animals.
Fur trappers trap animals and they may die in their traps before the trapper-hunter comes to collect the fur and the bodies. If the trapped animals are not dead the trapper cannot avoid killing the animal. The killing must be done carefully so as not to damage the animal's fur.
Africa
It is not killing/abusing/ or hurting animals It is not killing/abusing/ or hurting animals
In Britain it is illegal to breed animals solely or primarily for their fur. Cause great cruelty to the rabbits and that it is ethically wrong to kill.
Anyone can give a 2 minute speech on animal cruelty. The speech could be about the uses of fur, animal testing, and the poaching of animals for their meat, skin, and fur.
The Inuit used caribou fur after killing the animals. They would use fur of animals which they killed for meat.
Wearing fur contributes to animal suffering, as the fur industry often involves cruel practices in the breeding and killing of animals for their pelts. Additionally, fur production has significant environmental impacts, including habitat destruction and pollution. By choosing not to wear fur, individuals can promote animal welfare and support more sustainable fashion alternatives. Embracing cruelty-free options reflects a compassionate stance towards animals and the planet.
they survive by killing animals and using there fur
check articles on Wikipedia under the topic - "Cruelty to Animals". I'm sure it'll help.
The meaning of slaughtering of animals is having them killed or killing them usually for meat or fur.
yes very you are killing very innocent animals for their fur they didn't do anything and you don't need it