0
What else can I help you with?
Is the goo Cow hatya Killing is right or wrong?
wrong
Why the killing of osama bin laden is wrong?
Good question. Killing is not wrong. Killing without justification is perhaps wrong. Any government has a duty to protect its citizens. That duty often is onerous. Decisions have to be made. Some of which we may all not agree with. A decision was made, by duly appointed people, that killing Osama bin Laden would be for the common good. It was therefore carried out by the will of the people. It may have been wrong to do so.
Can surgery end up killing you?
If the doctors do it wrong, then possible
A sentence with the word 'belief' in it?
My belief is that killing people is wrong.
What are some environmental concerns for the desert?
Dehydraytionis the wrong answer. is it the killing of animals.
Why do you think killing is wrong?
Killing is wrong when that is done without reasons. e.g. a bad person killed and raped so many... so, he should be hanged. But, just to kill for minor reasons is bad.
Was killing Osama bin Laden wrong?
Yes and No,No: He was a Human, Why are we killing people?Yes: He was a horrible person, He needed to be stopped for good.
Are you against whaling?
Yes i am against whaling, due to people killing living speices, i think its toatlly wrong to kill our animals. Even if your killing them for food, let our animals be. Yes i am against whaling, due to people killing living speices, i think its toatlly wrong to kill our animals. Even if your killing them for food, let our animals be.
In what sense is Hamlet wrong in his plotting against and killing of Claudius?
++//*/98-/*6897877546017
Can Hindus handle beef at subway?
no because they think that killing an animal is wrong.
Is killing useful?
if your killing an animal for food purposes, then yes. if your killing a human being unless they did EXTREME wrong and were found guilty by a lawful court ( it may prove useful to have them off the streets ((E.g. a killer who kills innocent children would more then likely be deemed better off dead then alive, aka more useful dead)) then no. to sum it up : killing animals for food: useful Killing animals for no reason/leaving dead body's laying around: wrong/not ueful Killing a bad person, PROVEN to be bad by a court of law: may be useful Killing innocents: wrong/ not useful. Just my biased opinion, I'm not responsible for what you do after reading my advice.
Which of the following is not a moral absolutist claim?
Killing is wrong except in cases of self-defense.
