Want this question answered?
Firstly Mr no knowledge...SUROTIA surname is not from the Rajput caste. Surotia's are BRAHMINS (pandits) from rajasthan.
rajput. badgujar is a branch of rajput ( kshatriya). Some badgujar changed to Muslims or opted profession of lower caste due to Muslim attacks. But they are erstwhile Rajput
kashyap rajput are not lower caste ok
No.
No not at all chauhan is amongest the top caste in rajput.. chauhan belongs to rajput(kshatrya) l..king prithvi chauhan is the example.
Goon caste is very high class. They are after the Brahmin Caste.
No this not caste basically it is tribe, Ghrit is a separate tribe and does not fall under Hindu Varna systems. However, if you ask from cunning and mughal slave rajput and brahman misinformed by saying that Ghrit are lower caste.
is salgotra caste is lower cast
no, rajput sengar lie in upper rung of kshatriya rajputs they are descenders of rishivansh king dasratha married her sister to rishivansha
Chandra is not a caste. But many Vaisya and Kayasth use this as surname. It is more like a middle name. Like Kumar. But Vaisya and Kayasth in U.P. are using it to disguise their caste and get reservation benefit as O.B.C. It is same in Bihar, there also Vaisya(Bania) are using kUMAR(not a surname but middle name) to hide their upper caste identity and get reservation benefit under O.B.C. Only difference is in U.P. very few lower caste in U.P. use Chadra so it is easy to tell they are upper caste but in Bihar lots of lower cast use Kumar so it is very hard to tell persons caste.
No.Sarkar Surname Is Not.They Are A Sub Section Of Kshatriya Thakurs From The Bengal Province(Modern-day Indian state of West Bengal & Bangladesh).
Whole Jatts are ethinic group not caste however jatts are low caste Shudra's. They were slave right up to the 17th Century. It was around then they started to get land handouts and get confident. and yes Shoker/Chokkar/Shokar is a Jatt caste got In doaba side.