No. Look can be a verb or a noun, and if it is a noun and an object, it is a direct object. For example, "I saw a dangerous look on his face."
Indirect Object. (LOOK)----Direct object (ME)-----Indirect object A+LS (:
Indirect Object. (LOOK)----Direct object (ME)-----Indirect object A+LS (:
Indirect Object. (LOOK)----Direct object (ME)-----Indirect object A+LS (:
indirect object
indirect object
Indirect Object. (LOOK)----Direct object (ME)-----Indirect object A+LS (:
There is no indirect object; the direct object is 'it' (immediately is an adverb modifying the verb spent).
"You" can be either a direct or indirect object: It is a direct object in "I want to kiss you." It is an indirect object in "Henry is going to give you the tickets."
The direct object is "you"; the indirect object (I believe) is "this".
A compound indirect object is more than one indirect object. "We gave Martha and Bob many presents." ("presents" is the direct object, "Martha and Bob" is the compound indirect object)
Yes. In fact, a sentence must have a direct object in order to have an indirect object. (Note, however, that some consider the subject of a sentence in the passive voice to be an "implicit" indirect object, because it the sentence is changed to the active voice, the subject in the passive voice will often become an indirect object in the active voice.)
An indirect object is always a noun (or an equivalent phrase). I gave the dog a bone -- "the dog" is the indirect object.