Computers only understand machine code. Low-level Assembler language and all high-level languages must be assembled or compiled to machine code in order to execute. However, the computer itself can be programmed (with a machine-code program) to generate the required machine code from either a low-level or high-level input. Low-level Assembler is an almost one-to-one translation of symbols and mnemonics to machine code whereas high-level languages often compile to object code which is then linked to produce machine code.
Interpreted high-level languages are not compiled to machine code but are interpreted by another program, an interpreter, which translates each line of high-level code into the required machine code at runtime. Java, for instance, compiles to byte code suitable for the Java virtual machine. The JVM is a machine code program that interprets the byte code to produce machine-specific machine code. As a result of this interpretation, Java programs are much slower than machine-coded implementations of the same program.
no, machine level language is binary language. Some code of binary language are grouped and represented by unique symbols. The coding in these symbols is known as assembly language.
There are no "limitations" of machine language over other languages. Any task that you can accomplish in any other language can also be done in machine language. However, there are disadvantages to machine language, namely that machine language is difficult to read and write correctly compared to higher-level languages, and is dependent upon the hardware which it is written for.
Machine language is a stream of bytes interpreted by the CPU to perform operations on the computer. Reading machine language directly requires knowledge of or access to a list of "opcodes" (the numeric value associated with each instruction) in the program. Assembly language is a human-readable translation of machine language with additional features such as mapping of symbols to actual memory addresses or registers. People who use assembly language ultimately also become proficient in understanding machine language.For example, in the x86 architecture, this machine language:B8 05 00is represented in assembly language as: mov ax, 5It is clear for someone who understands the assembly language that the instruction will move the immediate value "5" into the register "ax."
The assembly language does not support object oriented program so they change to c and c++ the c++ will support object oriented program this are the demerits of assembly language.
There is very little difference, functionally, between assembly language and machine level language. Each assembly language statement corresponds to one machine instruction. The difference is in readability (who wants to read and write in hex code?) and in ease of address computation.
The programs written in Machine codes (like hexadecimal codes) are the Low level programs. These are understood only by the Microprocessor they are written for and written on. Whereas the High level programs are written in English like languages which are human redable.
Assembly languages are low level languages, sometimes also called machine-level languages.
HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGE The program weitten in English language which eassier to understand by user is called high level language. ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE The program written in symbolics form is called assembly language. In which the symbols are used like sub,mul,div, etc.it also called symbolic language. DIFFERENCE HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGE ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE 1) It is a source code. 1) It is a object code. 2) It is convertd in machine 2) It is convertd in machine language using compiler. language using assemblier.
Because it cannot be understood by users. High level language like C can be understood by the user by looking at its source code. But assembly level language does not have any source code, its a language converted from high level language to low level language (assembly level language or machine level language) so that the language which the user could read/understand can also be read/understand by the machine.
it is also called as binary language
There are no "limitations" of machine language over other languages. Any task that you can accomplish in any other language can also be done in machine language. However, there are disadvantages to machine language, namely that machine language is difficult to read and write correctly compared to higher-level languages, and is dependent upon the hardware which it is written for.
Machine language is a stream of bytes interpreted by the CPU to perform operations on the computer. Reading machine language directly requires knowledge of or access to a list of "opcodes" (the numeric value associated with each instruction) in the program. Assembly language is a human-readable translation of machine language with additional features such as mapping of symbols to actual memory addresses or registers. People who use assembly language ultimately also become proficient in understanding machine language.For example, in the x86 architecture, this machine language:B8 05 00is represented in assembly language as: mov ax, 5It is clear for someone who understands the assembly language that the instruction will move the immediate value "5" into the register "ax."
Yes! assembly language is machine dependent. Because program are written by means of memory and register on computer thats are very effective, and also have not high level skill in the program.
The assembly language does not support object oriented program so they change to c and c++ the c++ will support object oriented program this are the demerits of assembly language.
There is very little difference, functionally, between assembly language and machine level language. Each assembly language statement corresponds to one machine instruction. The difference is in readability (who wants to read and write in hex code?) and in ease of address computation.
The programs written in Machine codes (like hexadecimal codes) are the Low level programs. These are understood only by the Microprocessor they are written for and written on. Whereas the High level programs are written in English like languages which are human redable.
Machine code.
Only assembly languages are generally considered low-level programming languages, so one could argue that there is only one low-level language. However, there are as many assembly languages as there are processor models or families, as each processor family implements its own set of machine code instructions. Different manufacturers not only invent different mnemonics for similar machine code operations to suit conventions and hardware architecture (e.g. MOVE vs LOAD/SAVE), but also support different notations. Therefore, conceptually, the assembly language is the only low level programming language. However, the standpoint of view of learning the language, or from that of tools to support the language, there are numerous assembly languages, thus numerous low-level languages.