I don"t think it is because it has ing the ing sound to it so I think it is an adverb
- Cherixox2
The above is wrong. With "ly", it would be an adverb, however it is not. "Measuring can be a noun (as a gerund), an adjective (when descriping a noun), or part of a verb phrase (as a verb). For example, in the sentence: "The man is measuring the room" measuring is a verb. In the sentence: "The measring of the room was done" measuring is a noun. And in the sentence: "The measuring man stooped down to view the tape" measuring is an adjective (describes a noun).
~hoblaph
The correct spelling of the adjective, from measure, is measurable (weighable, quantifiable).
"Measurable" is an adjective, and English adjectives do not distinguish between plural and singular.
It is an adjective because if you said It was the heaviest object. The word heaviest is describing the noun: object.
Yes.
Measurable data is data that can be measure by a quantity. Measurable data is also known as quantitative data.
yes.since this functin is simple .and evry simple function is measurable if and ond only if its domain (in this question one set) is measurable.
The data collected does not have to be measurable.
We need measurable criteria to assess your progress.
Yes, the inverse image of a measurable set under a continuous map is measurable. If ( f: X \to Y ) is a continuous function and ( A \subseteq Y ) is a measurable set, then the preimage ( f^{-1}(A) ) is measurable in ( X ). This property holds for various types of measurable spaces, including Borel and Lebesgue measurability. Thus, continuous functions preserve the measurability of sets through their inverse images.
The correct spelling is measurable and not measureable.
You could describe any measurable characteristic as a trait.
Possibly under certain conditions, but not generally. Consider a nonmeasurable set A, and define f(x) = 1 if x in A 0 otherwise. Then {1} is certainly measurable but the inverse image {x | f(x) = 1} = A is not measurable.