No. Although some laws can be perceived as based on morals, there is a difference. For example, you think that strip clubs are not morally permissible. While strip clubs are regulated, they are not illegal. Therefore they are legally permissible. The same concept can be applied to contraception.
No moral and legal permissibility are not the same. Moral permissibility is what is morally allowed and legal permissibility is what is legally allowed. An act can be morally permissible but can also be against the law.
Legal norms and moral norms can coexist and sometimes overlap, but they are not always the same. Legal norms are enforced by the legal system, whereas moral norms are based on individual or societal beliefs about right and wrong. In some cases, legal norms may reflect moral norms, but in other cases, they may diverge.
He thought that it was a moral issue
Not necessarily. Morals are, by definition, more subjective than the law. You may have a moral obligation to do something for which there is no legal punishment available at all. Maybe you have a moral obligation to give your children presents as your money may permit, but there is no legal obligation to give them more than the necessaries, even if you are filthy rich. In other cases you may have a moral obligation that merely creates a separate and distinct legal obligation. For example, you may have a moral obligation to perform services on a contract, but you cannot be physically forced to actually perform. The only "legal obligation" would be to pay for damages caused by your failure to perform, if any. Therefore, even if there is a legal obligation stemming from such a moral obligation ("you gave your word"), they are not the same obligation.
A main legal, or moral requirement
The difference between legal rules and moral rules has to do with laws and how we behave regarding a moral code. Legal rules are based on laws that are set forth for us to follow. Moral rules have to do with a person's ethics. For example, it is not illegal to keep money that is found, but a person of high morals might try to return the money to the proper owner.
i think that moral obligation seem more important than legal responsibilities because moral obligation is the duty or responsibility in which he feels honour that why i think that moral obligation seem more important than legal responsibilities.
No a Moral isn't the same thing as a lesson. It sort of is but not by much.
Just distribution in society, structured by various moral, legal, and cultural rules and principles.
You do not have a legal obligation unless you agreed in writing to be responsible. You may have a moral obligation depending on the circumstances but you need to rely on your own moral compass to give you the answer in that case.You do not have a legal obligation unless you agreed in writing to be responsible. You may have a moral obligation depending on the circumstances but you need to rely on your own moral compass to give you the answer in that case.You do not have a legal obligation unless you agreed in writing to be responsible. You may have a moral obligation depending on the circumstances but you need to rely on your own moral compass to give you the answer in that case.You do not have a legal obligation unless you agreed in writing to be responsible. You may have a moral obligation depending on the circumstances but you need to rely on your own moral compass to give you the answer in that case.
Not all actions that are legal align with moral principles, as laws may be influenced by various factors such as societal norms or political agendas. However, actions that are deemed moral based on ethical considerations are often viewed as deserving to be legalized because they promote the well-being and fairness of individuals in society. It is important for legal systems to continually assess and evolve laws to ensure that they reflect moral values and principles.
Lawful perhaps, but without moral justification.