no
Yes, it seems that the Internet does affect the morality of a person. What is viewed on the Internet might initially cause shock or dismay but eventually becomes commonplace in some cases.
Those that help us live.
The question of morality all depends on each individual person. Who is to say it is only for one person?
The question of morality all depends on each individual person. Who is to say it is only for one person?
Yes.
A:I would expect the same standards from a moral religious person as from a moral non-religious person, no less. The one important difference would probably be the person's own assessment of the reason for his morality. The moral religious person is likely to attribute his or her morality to guidance from God; the moral non-religious person is likely to attribute his or her morality to conscience and a desire to do good for others.
Morality is brought about by one having the wisdom to know the difference between good and bad morals. A wise person will have correct and acceptable moral standards, while an unwise person may have loose morals, morals which are not acceptable to the general public.
Yes, ethical egoism is contrary to common sense morality.
Objective morality refers to the belief that moral principles are universal and independent of individual beliefs or opinions. It is based on the idea that certain actions are inherently right or wrong regardless of personal perspectives. On the other hand, subjective morality is based on personal beliefs and opinions, meaning that what is considered right or wrong can vary from person to person.
yes
For human individuals, yes.
Morality as seamless is a common approach taken by deontologists (ethical thinkers preoccupied with our duties and obligations).