no they are both good and worth purchasing and have been out long enough that they can be both purchased for less that you will pay for MW3
both of them are amazing games. mw2 has better multiplayer but the campaign might be a bit confusing without mw1. mw2 is a better game but just get both .
in some ways yea MW2 is harder than MW1 but the game itself is 100000000000000 times better than MW1 especially the online part of it i recommend getting it!!!
No but there is a mw1 for wii
For sure, call of duty modern warfare was much better then modern warfare 2. It is number 3 on ign's top 10 first person shooters. It has a much better campaign and won many game of the year awards, where this year uncharted 2 walked away with most of them. So to awnser your question Yes, mw1 is better than mw2.
Your Roach In MW2 Your Soap In MW1 And A Bunch Of Random Peaple In MW3
Both.
Your previous COD levels. From MW1, WaW, MW2, Black Ops. You receive one prestige point for if you have prestiged before in a COD game. Example- MW1- prestige 3 MW2- prestige 10 WaW- no prestige Black Ops- prestige 12 You would receive 3 prestige points because you prestiged in MW1, MW2, and Black Ops.
i think mw1 because there is less modding and the maps a less caotic (apart from shipment) and the camo looks better on it and the missons are cooler
COD MW2 is a much better game than WAW because the guns on MW2 are much better and more powerful. Trust me i know what im saying is true!
id say it will be most likely unless theres a 4th if there is, it will come out in a year or more
I would suspect that some of the population still plays Cod5. Still, a large majority of COD players went with MW2, but then went back to MW1
Sorry there's a deluxe edition of MW1 though but no MW2's 4 wii