Mythology is the study of myths (the lore of ancient people).
Science is an enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the natural world.
No, mythology is not considered science.
No. It is the study of myths (mytho-logy), but it is not a science.
If you think about it, mythology usually explains how the world evolved into it's present form, but in a cultural and religious way. But science fiction is based on future technology and basically, science, like UFOs. Mythology is explained unscientifically, and talks about imagined and unreal creatures, gods, and goddesses.
The Earth science area that has its origins in mythology is paleontology. This is the study of the evolution and changes in life on the planet.
Yes, Krishna is considered an avatar of Vishnu in Hindu mythology.
considered is not science. It is a word
Part Truth.
Mythology was created to answer humans question about nature and their lives. It explained natural phenomena that they didn't have the science to explain.
It is considered folklore. All of Greek mythology isn't contained in one folktale, but the individual myths are each a folktale.
It is the same as any mythology. It is made up of stories to explain the world to the people who did not understand today's science.
Phobias are an aspect of psychology, which is considered a science. So yes, phobias are a science of sorts
At the time, they weren't myths, they believed it or at least I think they did. Therefore, it wasn't Science but Religon.
No, Hanuman is not considered to be an avatar of Shiva in Hindu mythology. He is believed to be an incarnation of Lord Shiva's devotee, Lord Hanuman.