It comes down to preference. Some like the game series of Mario and Zelda and for them that is what makes the Nintendo franchise thus their preference in N64, however some find the Spyro series to be more engaging. Graphic wise each system is very similar. But to be fair N64 has a larger fan and more consistent fan base, but again it's preference.
.j.
there is ecw anarchy rulz and ecw hardcore revolution for the ps1, n64, and sega dreamcast.ECW Hardcore Revolution Is For The N64,Dreamcast,And Gameboy Color and Is Rated M On N64 and Dreamcast but E On Gameboy Color.Anarchy Rulz is Only for PS1 And Dreamcast and is rated T
N64, sega, dreamcast,
Because the Sega Saturn was defeated by PS1 and N64, and once PS2 came out it defeated the Dreamcast. Sega realized it was time to abandon the console market, so they cancelled the Dreamcast and started making games for other systems.
That's more of an opinion!
No, it is only for Dreamcast, Gamecube, Microsoft Windows, Playstation 3 (PSN) and xbox 360 (XBLA) Dreamcast, Nintendo GameCube, Microsoft Windows, Zeebo,[3] PlayStation 3 (PSN), Xbox 360 (XBLA)
It depends on what you like.
It's a matter of opinion rather than which is actually better. From past experience my N64 has been much more reliable compared to multiple PS and PS1's I have owned. (PS Skinny and PS Fat) I actually prefare the games on the N64 mostly because they're nostalgic and I enjoy the games available exclusively to N64.
The great thing about Dreamcast is that it will read a regular CD that you can burn off your computer. All you need to do is find a site with the emulators you need, burn them to disc (in Dreamcast format), and then game on! Just make sure you burn the emulator to one disc and the games to a separate one.
Dreamcast is probably way better in almost every aspect; however, the Saturn is more expensive than the Dreamcast on eBay and Amazon. It is probably due to some games exclusive to the Saturn and some gamers don't want to use an emulator.
No it was not even in the same category or it would not have been discontinued by Sega in 2001. It does have a 128 bit system while the PS2 has a 64 bit system see related links to compare the hardware. There are rumors that it was only cancelled because the new President wanted the Sega to develop software
Goldeneye for the Wii has much better graphics, and a developed storyline. But I still prefer the original for the N64 for its simple-ness
Depends who you ask, or how you define 'better'. Not if the majority of games has bad graphics and you only are trying to say it was capable of better results if the games are better The N64 had Trilinear filtering. This allowed it to display much smoother textures than the PS1 could, in fact the PS1's interpolation method produced noticably pixellated textures. However, one big problem was that the N64 didn't have that much space on the game cartridges for high quality textures. That meant simpler ones had to be used sometimes, or smaller textures were stretched out, giving them a blurry appearance. Some games compensated by having a simple and cartoony style. Later cartridges did have more space for detailed graphics, and for these, the difference between the PS1 was much clearer. So, was the N64 capable of better graphics - yes. Did the vast majority of N64 games utilitse this capability fully - no.