No. Ancient volcanic activity did occur in the region, but it is not at all prone to earthquakes in modern times.
Chile is highly prone to earthquakes
Western and southern Mexico qualify as such. The region is located on the subduction zone between the North American, Pacific and Cocos tectonic plates. It is also known as part of the "Ring of Fire" with plenty of volcanoes and prone to earthquakes.
Don't live in an area prone to earthquakes.
Yes, the Philippines' location on the Pacific Ring of Fire and its tropical climate makes it prone to earthquakes and typhoons.
Alaska is the most prone to earthquakes in the US.
Yes. Several areas in Russia are prone to earthquakes.
'seismic' = prone to earthquakes 'aseismic' = the absence of notable earthquakes
Alaska is the most earthquake prone state averaging about 12,000 earthquakes each year. Alaska has so many earthquakes because the Pacific Plate is sinking under the North American Plate, where Alaska is located. California is the second most earthquake prone state averaging about 10,000 earthquakes each year. California has so many earthquakes because of the San Andreas Fault, the North American Plate rubbing against the Pacific Plate. *each earthquake is not always felt or noticeable*
liloan
Yes. Haiti is prone to hurricanes, earthquakes, and landslides.
Areas prone to earthquakes should be identified so that people can prepare for them. Most notably, bridges and public buildings should be built to withstand earthquakes.
Many parts of Australia's eastern half and the north are flood-prone due to the numerous river systems and low plains throughout the region. The northern and eastern coasts are also prone to summer cyclones (which bring heavy rains) and seasonal monsoonal rains. These rains can send large amounts of water across the northern plains, through Queensland's "channel country", which floods huge areas of land in north western Queensland. Another particularly flood-prone region is the Hunter Valley in New South wales.