Yes, nuclear energy does not produce CO2 by-products. No by-products are released into the atmosphere, all are contained within the reactor. The energy comes from a neutron colliding with a uranium atom causing it to split into two different atoms.
it would die
it doesnt breathe
it is an invisible gas, it doesnt look like anything
Faster breathing doesnt allow complete exhale
aerobic respiration is produced with oxgen where as anarobic doesnt have any oxgen presentaerobic :Glucose + oxygen = Carbon Dioxide + water + energyanaerobic:Glucose = Carbon Dioxide + ethanol +energy
it doesnt smart one. go somewhere else to look.
Respiration, breathing, has no effect on the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. This is part of the natural carbon cycle. Burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) releases carbon dioxide that has been hidden away for millions of years. This extra gas is increasing in the atmosphere.
If you freeze it (probably only in lab conditions) it will turn to a solid and therefore will not pollute the air!
It doesnt sound safe! No as there is always a certain amount in the air, however if you inhale nothing but that, you would suffocate.
Nope -- they do just exactly the opposite: inhale and use oxygen, and exhale more carbon dioxide, just as all mammals do. This was an old wive's tale that's been around for years, that goes on to say cats can suck away a baby's breath -- which has no basis in fact whatsoever.
If you google "diagram oxygen-carbon dioxide cycle", from the image search, you'll see tons of diagrams. I tried to post one, in response to your question, but some rude person deleted it without any explanation.
Prokaryotic cell doesnt have a nuclear membrane.