At present it is no kind of energy source and unlikely to be for many years to come. Technically it would be non-renewable, but the raw material is the most common element in the universe so that's not likely to be an insurmountable problem.
There is no logical reason. Traditional "renewables" are constantly renewed by the sun, but both fission and fusion have enough fuel on Earth to power society until long after the sun explodes, so the distinction is meaningless.
It is nonrenewable fuel of cases you can take out the old fuel and replace it with new fuel
Nonrenewable, eventually the oceans will run out of extractable deuterium. But thatt probably won't happen for a few million years.
The idea of nuclear fusion occurring at room temperature is called cold fusion.
Nuclear fusion doesn't produce energy.
nuclear fusion make more energy and they both make energy and have waste products
Nuclear fusion is itself a difficult enough one to crack!
You can find nuclear fusion in a star.
yes, once the fuel is consumed the reaction ends.
yes, once the fuel is consumed the reaction ends.
It would technically be a nonrenewable resource, because the elements we use (uranium) will eventually run out.
Nonrenewable, eventually the oceans will run out of extractable deuterium. But thatt probably won't happen for a few million years.
nuclear fusion
Nuclear Fusion
no
Combining two atomic nuclei is called nuclear fusion.
Fusion is a nuclear reaction.
The idea of nuclear fusion occurring at room temperature is called cold fusion.
Nuclear fusion produces nuclear energy
That would be nuclear fusion, like what happens in stars, when two hydrogen nuclei combine to form a helium nucleus.