answersLogoWhite

0

No, it is not.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is waste disposal a problem of nuclear energy?

Yes, but it is a manageable problem


Which is not a problem associated with the increase of nuclear energy?

Three problems associated with nuclear waste


Is not a problem associated with the increased use of nuclear energy?

Three problems associated with nuclear waste


Is nuclear energy the clenest form of energy?

Not quite. The problem of getting rid of the nuclear waste has not been satisfactorily solved.


A disadvantage of atomic energy is the?

The nuclear waste problem is far from being solved.


One problem with using energy is that it produces radioactive waste?

Nuclear? Possibly.


What is the most environmentally safe sort of energy?

Solar and wind energy is the most safe. Of the renewable energies, nuclear can produce nuclear waste and go critical, while hydroelectric power can displace many acres of land. Wind and solar energy produce no waste, do not pollutes, and do not displace.


Is solar energy more efficient than nuclear energy?

Solar energy and nuclear energy are both efficient in their own ways. Solar energy is renewable and non-polluting, but it is dependent on weather conditions and location. Nuclear energy is a reliable source of power, but it produces radioactive waste and has associated safety concerns. The efficiency of each depends on factors such as cost, environmental impact, and energy output.


What is a problem caused by using nuclear energy (apex)?

There are arguments about where to store the waste. (APEX)


Which is not a problem associated with the increase use of nuclear energy?

Three problems associated with nuclear waste


How does nuclear energy use differ from geothermal and solar energy use?

Nuclear energy uses fission reactions to generate heat for electricity production, while geothermal energy uses heat from the Earth's core and solar energy uses sunlight to directly generate electricity. Both geothermal and solar energy are considered renewable sources, whereas nuclear energy produces radioactive waste that requires careful disposal. Additionally, nuclear energy plants are more complex and costly to build compared to geothermal and solar energy systems.


Is solar power or nuclear power better?

The 'power' that comes from a both nuclear and solar is the same - it's electricity. Nuclear power is quite clean while it is being produced (assuming nothing goes wrong with the plant), however getting rid of the harmful nuclear waste after it's use is an extremely difficult pollution problem. Solar power is 100% clean, and no harmful waste is caused after it's useful life. If you were to power a house with solar electricity, it can either be done by suplimenting the electricity needs at night with other green electicity (such as from a green energy supplier), or the electricity from the solar panels can be stored in solar batteries then power will be available day and night. Looking at the very short term problem, nuclear produces a lot of power and is clean (apart from after it's use). Looking at long term, and the need to reduce pollution and nuclear waste then more solar power is better. Nuclear and solar should work together - If more houses/buildings were powered by solar (and other green electicity) then it would mean reducing the need for quite as many nuclear power stations.