There is obviously a correlation between population numbers and the amount of fuels used. Many of which release CO2 into the atmosphere. CO2, after water vapour, being the main contributor to the greenhouse effect.
The exact amount of change caused by over population is very difficult to calculate.
The rise in temperature all over the world. This is not more accurate. It is the same way of saying it. Global warming causes climate change, but is not the same as climate change.
There are no unpreventable causes of global warming. We could have prevented it, and we can still prevent the worst results if we act now.Change to renewable energyStop burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas)Replant the earth's forests.
The opposite of global warming is global cooling, which refers to a decrease in the Earth's average temperature over an extended period of time.
loss of habitat, global warming, over-hunting, toxic waste, not enough food, etc.
Global means world-wide. Some local weather is cold, but globally, the world over, we are warming.
Global Warming
Global warming is not cold, as it (if it really exists) causes to temps around the world to increase. There was no doubt that the earth went through a period of warming, but now this seems to have reversed itself over the last 17 years. Many areas are experiencing some of the coldest winter temps in decades this year.
True global warming does not decrease temperatures. So, either the model for global warming's effects is hokus-pokus, or global warming as presently claimed, does not exist. Some global warming followers will have you believe that global warming makes the weather "act crazy". If true, then it is not really global warming, is it.
Global comes from globe, meaning the earth. So global means "all over the earth". Warming comes from the adjective warm, meaning a bit hot, so warming means "getting warm". So Global Warming means that the whole earth is getting warm.
yes
No, not tower over New York. Global warming will certainly flood low-lying areas of New York.
Extremely conservative groups tend to be more critical of the evidence of global warming. This has more to do ideology than idiocy, even though over 97% of scientists acknowledge the existence of of global warming.