No. Its a poor conductor.
No. It has no free ions to conduct current. Neither is water unless it contains salt or other impurities.
PETROL IS A BAD CONDUCTOR OF ELECTRICITY. BUT IF YOU INDUCE IONS IN PETROL THEN IT CAN ACT AS A SEMI CONDUCTOR. IT ALL DEPENDS ON THE MEDIA OF TRANSMISSION. IF THEY ARE IONS WHICH ARE TRACES OF METAL THEN ANY INORGANIC MATTER CAN ACT AS GOOD CONDUCTOR. ELECTRICITY IS ONLY ABOUT THE AFFINITY OF NEGATIVE CHARGED ELECTRONS TO POSITIVE ELECTRONS TO SATISFY THE LOSS OF ONE SINGLE ELECTRON FROM ONE OF THE ELECTRONIC CONFIGURATION RINGS I.E s,p,d OR f. WHERE IN THE VALENCY IS SATISFIED AND THE MEDIUM CAN BE ANY MATERIAL. ALL DEPENDS ON THE IONIC AFFINITY.
Water is a conductor of electricity, so using it to put out an electrical fire can result in electric shock or spreading the fire. In the case of a petrol tank fire, water is denser than petrol and can cause the petrol to spread, making the fire larger. It may also cause an explosion due to the rapid vaporization of water.
Conductor
An electrical conductor is a material which lets electricity pass through it.
At a high enough voltage, everything is an electrical conductor. Pure water is an exceptionally bad electrical conductor, though.
The purpose of a conductor shield in electrical cables is to protect the conductor from electromagnetic interference and to prevent leakage of electrical signals.
Its conductivity is 0.0017·10-6 s·m-1, so it is not a good conductor of electricity.
Yes, because it is metal it is. :)
Molybdenum is typically considered to be an electrical conductor due to its high thermal and electrical conductivity. Its conductivity properties make it a desirable material for applications where good electrical conductivity is required.
conductor-copper insulator-rubber
No charcoal is not an electrical conductor