No these two concepts are different, but they do overlap.
Social constructionism is a theory that asserts that aspects of reality are not inherent or objective, but rather are created through social interactions and perceptions. It emphasizes the role of language, symbols, and cultural norms in shaping individual and collective understandings of the world. This perspective suggests that social systems and institutions, such as gender, race, and class, are constructed by society rather than being natural or essential categories.
disadvantages of social construction?
social constructionism
social constructionism
Social constructionism
VIVIEN BURR has written: 'SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONISM'
Stanley L Witkin has written: 'Social construction and social work practice' -- subject(s): Social constructionism, Social service
Alexander hamlinton advocated strict constructionism in government
Social construction refers to the idea that the meaning and significance of concepts, beliefs, and practices are created and maintained by society rather than being inherently fixed or natural. It highlights how our understanding of reality, identities, and social norms is shaped by cultural, historical, and institutional forces.
Strict constructionism is a judicial philosophy that interprets the Constitution based on its original intent and text, strictly adhering to the literal meaning of the words within it. Judges following this philosophy typically do not incorporate contemporary values or societal changes in their interpretations.
The social theory that contends that reality is constructed and how social action is understood is known as symbolic interactionism. This perspective emphasizes the importance of symbols, language, and interaction in shaping individuals' perceptions and behaviors within society. It suggests that reality is constantly being negotiated and interpreted through social interactions.
Progressive.