No. "Racial Equality" is a philosophical ideal, one which promotes the concept that all human beings, regards of genetic background, should be considered equal in the eyes of the law (and other humans).
These days, "racial equality" as a philosophy is subscribed to (i.e. believed) by the vast majority of Americans. That said, there is significant debate about the practical matters of how racial equality is to be handled, and the government's role in helping bring about the reality of the ideal. As such, particular positions on the implementation of racial equality by a politician are often (perhaps usually) an attempt to garner votes.
Votes are NOT viewed concerning political equality.
James Farmer did not receive any electoral votes in a presidential election. He was a prominent civil rights leader and co-founder of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), but he never ran for president or held an electoral office. His contributions were primarily in activism rather than in electoral politics.
Political deadlock is a situation where competing political parties have equal representation in the political system making it impossible for decisions to be made.
"Political arithmetic" is a fancy way of saying "counting votes."
yes
Political Machine
jobs
Partisans
Political Party
take votes from other parties
DEMOCRATICS
That you can vote for the president and other political votes.