if you compare theses two on both PC system which are equal including the memory CPU and mobo. The gtx 295 will still lead the benchmark score by at least 20%
Yes by a long shot
At what age you live in. If you asked this question 8-10 years back i would say no GFX is faster than this. Today's Most powerful Graphic cards are as follows:1. ATI RADEON 59702. Nvidia GeForce GTX 4603. ATI RADEON 58704. ATI Radeon 58505. Nvidia GeForce GTX 2856. ATI RADEON 4870 X 27. Nvidia GeForce GTX 2808. Nvidia GeForce GTX 2759. ATI RADEON 489010. Nvidia GeForce GTX 260and Nvidia Is launching GEFORCE 480 and 470
the 4330 newer anyway, should be better, nvidea recomende is more marketing than fact, although I do preffer nvidia cards. Do not waste money on an old card like a 7900 gt tho, for the same price you can get a GTS 250, but wait is this for an Mac book? then sure go for the nvidia
no
no not at all 8800GT is better
The ATI Radeon HD 6310 is a newer graphics card and better than the HD 4250
Performance-wise, the GeForce 9800 GTX should in theory be a little bit better than the Radeon HD 4850 overall (about 10% faster).The GeForce 9800 GTX is much (more or less 47%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the Radeon HD 4850.The GeForce 9800 GTX will be just a bit (more or less 15%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon HD 4850, and should be capable of handling higher resolutions more effectively.
Sapphire HD 5450 is better than Sapphire HD 6450 .
nVidia GeForce GT 220 is a little better than than the 512 mb Radeon HD 4350. nVidia GeForce GT 220 is better if you are using it for gaming too. It works great with all the most popular games like The Sims 3, Spore, Left 4 Dead, Fallout 3, and World of Warcraft. Even if you aren't gaming the GT 220 is a little nicer, but unless you are using it for gaming, its not a big enough difference to be worth the money. If you are not gaming though, I would stick with the hd 4350.
it will never be GeForce 8400 is improved and and is better than GeForce 6800 in every way
ATI Radeon HD 4250 is a better graphics accelerator than Intel's
Well my friend, I did some research and found out that they are pretty close to a tie. This is because in some ways the radeon is better and in other ways it's not. I have some info on the 280 right here: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3930709&CatId=3669 and some info on the radeon right here: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=3947461&CatId=3670 Just scroll down and see the specs. In one big way that the 280 is better than the radeon is that the 280 has exactly ywice the memory as the radeon but it's your choice. I most likely get the radeon. If this isn't helpful enough, contact a professional at logan@tiger.tv