Unconstitutional as it would provide for hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine devices (IUDS) which have been proven to have post-fertilization effects, meaning they cause changes in the lining of the uterus so that a newly conceived baby cannot implant and thus get "aborted" (this is what is called its abortifacient effect). Please check wikipedia for details and the Americal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology to verify the truth of this statement.
NO! Though the proponents of the RH Bill claim that its purpose is to promote responsible parenthood, family planning, reproductive health (meaning the absence of disease or infirmity) and prevent abortion, the means they are proposing are unconstitutional and illicit. The end does not justify the means.
The Health Reproductive bill in the Philippines respresents a bill that is passed to have better access to health in the country especially for women and children needing it.
slogan of the reproductive health bill
The reproductive health bill was established in 2012. This bill's purpose is to get reproductive health for families, such as birth control and maternal check ups for pregnant women.
Type your answer here... this is corny i want to know what syntax is or reproductive health bill and here i have to answer very disgusting.
Reproductive Health Bill
Reproductive Health Bill
Reproductive Health Bill
1651516424
no
5551115555
none