Science in itself is neither good nor bad. It depends on how science is used. If it is used to get at the truth, it is good. Sadly, though, instead of being used to get at the truth, it is sometimes used for other purposes.
Science has caused some atrocities, however it is also solely responsible for the survival of the sheer majority of the population.
For example. A single ammonia producing process (for fertiliser) discovered by science is now responsible for feeding 40% of the worlds population. That is about 3 billion people sustained by a single scientific process. However modern weapons would not exist without science. Science has been mostly applied for good, however there are a large amount of evils as a result too.
Science is neutral, what matters is how humans have applied it.
There is no good or bad science. If you enjoy it, it can be categorised as good science but if you do not like science it is bad science
If you would say "Are you good in science?" that would refer to your behavior. However if you would say " Are you good at science?" that can refer to your behavior or your knowledge.
good "science" or a good experiment can always be repeated with the same result
Science and technology increase the Sociology......
Science and maths are of course interrelated. But it is not necessary that a person good at maths are good at science.
what is a good name for science magazine
Good Science Studio was created in 2009.
A good topic for a science report can be an animal.
a good science experiment is a 3d plant cell model
science yes, if your aren't good at these id recommend learning science, math and spelling too...
according to me science related articles are good in a science class because they help us to understand the topic better.
NO, you really have to be good at math to do science because of all the formulas