no
==================================
Another contributor enlarged:
Space exploration will be a waste of financial resources the next time a large cargo vehicle is
loaded with $1,000 bills and launched, either on a course to leave earth and never return, or
to re-enter the earth's atmosphere and be totally incinerated. This has never been done yet.
Every cent spent so far on space exploration has been paid into the pockets of the people who
mine the chemicals and minerals that go into the rockets and their fuel, refine and smelt the
materials, fabricate and assemble everything from the nose-cone to the launch pad, design,
build, and test the fuel tanks, the computers, the food packs, and the space-suit helmets and
boots, write the procedures to organize the thousands of other people who work together
during the mission ... and the people who implement the procedures ... and the people who
spend the months and years after the mission analyzing the data and the samples that it returns.
Not a penny leaves the earth. The money goes to people, who use it to buy stuff, including the
cars they use to drive to work, the gas that makes the cars run, and the lunches they bring to work
with them. Many of them also spend it on things like TV sets, clothing, movies, house payments,
vacations, lawn mowers, and putting their kids through college. Notice that these purchases are
very similar to purchases made by people who aren't connected with space exploration in any way.
The only difference is that until now, all that money has come from taxpayers and been funneled
by the government, right back into the national economy, just like any other government program.
The money doesn't get shot into space.
It is a waste of money and time.
Because it is a waste of time Waste of money Risks to life
Pro: 1. technology can develop 2. Provide new resources 3. Learn more about space Con: 1. Waste of $$$$$ 2. Risk of human life 3. No new thinking
Rather than having WikiAnswers start out on the defensive, we invite the questioner to come back and outline his case for space exploration being a waste of money, whereupon we can refute his points individually and more effectively.
NO! If there is a problem on Earth (like oh i dont know, GLOBAL WARMING), we would need a "plan B" planet to land on.
It is a waste of money and time.
Because it is a waste of time Waste of money Risks to life
Discuss the understanding by some authorities that relationship management is a waste of an organisation's resources.
Pro: 1. technology can develop 2. Provide new resources 3. Learn more about space Con: 1. Waste of $$$$$ 2. Risk of human life 3. No new thinking
Rather than having WikiAnswers start out on the defensive, we invite the questioner to come back and outline his case for space exploration being a waste of money, whereupon we can refute his points individually and more effectively.
Rather than having WikiAnswers start out on the defensive, we invite the questioner to come back and outline his case for space exploration being a waste of money, whereupon we can refute his points individually and more effectively.
There you have it ... the answer to your own question: It isn't just a waste of money, therefore it continues to be done.
well, you waste money on exploring it. = D
Recycling is a good way of preserving natural resources to space resources since it needs less energy and no space is required for waste.
NO! If there is a problem on Earth (like oh i dont know, GLOBAL WARMING), we would need a "plan B" planet to land on.
yes it is really a waste of ntural resources
Yes, there is nuclear waste in space.