yes sulfur is a non-renewable resource.
Sulfur is considered a non-renewable resource because it is extracted from deposits in the earth's crust and once used, it can't be easily replaced within a human lifetime. It can be recycled and reused but is not produced naturally at a rate that can replenish what is extracted.
Sulfur is considered a non-renewable resource since it is primarily extracted from natural deposits, such as volcanic regions and salt domes, and cannot be replenished on a short timescale. However, it is abundant in nature and can be recycled from certain industrial processes.
Sulfur is considered a non-renewable resource because it is typically extracted from nonrenewable sources such as natural gas, crude oil, and mineral deposits. Once these sources are depleted, it can take millions of years for new sulfur deposits to form. However, sulfur can also be recovered as a byproduct of certain industrial processes, which can help offset its non-renewable status.
NO its not. Even though it will reproduce (kind of) it takes millions of years. So while we're alive it won't be renewed, in essence its a non-renewable resource because of that.
Non renewable
No - it is non-renewable
Non renewable
Renewable - unlimited source Non renewable - limited resource
Non-renewable
Silver is a non-renewable mineral.
Non-renewable
Non.