Yes, if it were completely regular, its past tense would be 'taked' rather than 'took'.
'Taken' is the past participle of the verb, and the past participle is a place where regular has a different kind of meaning. The form it takes does roughly qualify as regular.
"Seen" is the irregular past participle of "to see".
Taken is an irregular verb. Taken is the past participle of the verb 'take'. If the verb was regular, then the past tense of 'take' would be 'taked' whereas instead it's took and taken.
irregular If it were regular, it would be take, taked, taked instead of take, took, taken.
"Have" is an irregular verb in English.
It's irregular.
"Taken" is an irregular verb, "Take, took, taken." If it were regular it would be "Take, taked, taked".
"Took" is the past tense of the irregular verb "take," while "taken" is the past participle form of the same verb. Irregular verbs do not follow the standard pattern of adding "-ed" for their past tense or past participle forms. In contrast, regular verbs form their past tense and past participle by adding "-ed."
It's an irregular verb.
What is your question ????In this sentence take is an irregular verb
irregular verb irregular verb
Yes it's an irregular verb.
It's an irregular verb.