Yes. It's just about turned every military person into a law enforcement official.
Conventional warfare consisted of rules, uniforms, and governments.
Terrorism has NO rules, NO uniforms, and NO government(s).
Generally: Terrorism is a criminal act and guerrilla warfare is a tactic used in war.
Terrorism typically targets civilians to instill fear and achieve political or ideological goals through violence, while conventional warfare involves armed conflict between military forces of opposing states. Terrorist organizations may aim to destabilize governments, gain attention for their cause, or provoke fear and panic in society through their attacks.
Counter Terrorism
Conventional conflict refers to armed confrontations between nation-states or organized military forces that rely on traditional warfare tactics, including the use of conventional weapons and strategies. This type of conflict typically involves battles on land, sea, or air, adhering to established rules of engagement and international laws. Unlike unconventional warfare, which may include guerrilla tactics, terrorism, or cyber warfare, conventional conflict is characterized by its structured and state-centric nature. It often aims for clear military objectives and territorial control.
From guerrilla to conventional warfare.
Conventional means accepted standards. Conventional weapons are normal weapons that most nations possess; warships, airplanes, artillery, tanks, Machineguns, etc. Un-Conventional Weapons are weapons that most nations do NOT possess. Nuclear Weapons would be un-conventional weapons. An un-heard of primitive weapon might be considered an un-conventional weapon. The term can also be applied to warfare itself: Un-Conventional Warfare might be guerrilla warfare; Conventional warfare would be traditional Armies fighting against another Army.
Ike Jeanes has written: 'Forecast and solution' -- subject(s): Conventional Warfare, Forecasting, Mathematical models, Nuclear proliferation, Nuclear warfare, War, Warfare, Conventional
Hardcastle and McCormick - 1983 Conventional Warfare - 3.11 was released on: USA: 9 December 1985
it does not adhere to traditional rules or boundaries, and it aims to instill fear and panic among the general population rather than to gain strategic military advantage. It often involves attacks on civilians and non-combatants, usually carried out by non-state actors, making it distinct from conventional warfare between nation-states. Additionally, terrorism relies on psychological impact and propaganda to achieve its objectives, further distinguishing it from traditional forms of warfare.
Hardcastle and McCormick - 1983 Conventional Warfare 3-11 was released on: USA: 9 December 1985
Transitional or traditional? Not sure what question you are asking, but he used un-conventional warfare (guerrilla warfare) in the beginning, but was FORCED to use conventional warfare once US jets began the air war over North Vietnam (his nation) in '65.
Advisery in the beginning, then guerrilla warfare, then conventional warfare with tanks and B-52 bombers.