It is a slightly grey area, but generally no.
They helped for testing. scientists could test on the animals cells rather than human cells.
The mitochondria, which produces ATP. ATP is used as an energy source in animal cells
yes, lysosomes are only contained within animal cells to hydrolyze macromolecules
Plant and animal cells are both eukaryotes. However, some animal cells may be prokaryotes, like red blood cells. RBC do not have nucleus. They are considered prokaryotes, so they do not live long.
Yes, there are differences between plants and animal cells, following differences can be considered : 1) Plant cells have cell wall which is absent in animal cell. 2) Plant cell lack centrioles whereas animal cells have centrioles.
Bacteria is a Prokaryote, a simple cell with no true nucleus. Animal and Plant cells are considered Eukaryotic, cells with a true nucleus.
The transportation, care, and use of animals should be in accordance with the Animal.
no it is not as bad then animal testing
There are two types of cells. Plant cells, and animal cells. Just because people have animal cells, we are not animals. People are also too narrow of a group to become an own organism group.
SUPER EXPTREMLY EXPENSIVE animal testing is the cheapest and most efficiant way
Nucleus' are found in both plant and animal cells. They are considered the "brain" of a cell.
Using animal testing and also using human cells xx