No, but it can be a subordinating conjunction in sentences such as "There are more stars in the universe than there are grains of sand on your local beach."
Other times, used in parallel construction, than acts more like a preposition: "He is taller than her brother" rather than "He is taller than she is."
The coordinating conjunction in the sentence is "and."
it is the same as a coordinating conjunction
it is the same as a coordinating conjunction
The conjunct is "or", which is a coordinating conjunction of the alternative type.The conjunction "or" is a coordinating conjunction.
No, it is a subordinating conjunction. In the mnemonic FANBOYS, the A stands for 'and" -- the 7 coordinating conjunctions are: for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so.
Yes, it is one of the 7 coordinating conjunctions, although it essentially means "because" (which is a subordinating conjunction). It can connect independent clauses.
No, it is called a correlative conjunction. These are identifiable because they are separated in the sentence that uses them. Other correlative (paired) conjunctions are either-or and neither-nor.
The coordinating conjunction in the sentence is "for."
The coordinating conjunction in the sentence is "and," which is joining the two subjects "Sandra" and "I" in the sentence.
You don't put a comma in a coordinating conjunction, the comma goes before a coordinating conjunction. Coordinating conjunctions are used to connect two or more independent clauses.Sally was late to work today, and her boss fired her.
I don't now?!
No, it is not. The word "or" is a coordinating conjunction.