I think YES
It's much better than the Geforce 2, and probably on par/ slightly lower in speed than the 6600.
it will never be GeForce 8400 is improved and and is better than GeForce 6800 in every way
Normally the 6000 GT would be, but the 9400 GT a lot Newer than the 6600 so its overall faster.
The geforce 8800 GTS is slightly better than the 9400GT
The GTS 250 is much better. The GTS 250 is similar to a 9800 GTX.
No. GeForce cards started off in the thousands, then went into the hundreds. So the 410m is far superior to the 8800gt, as is the latest card, the GTX 670.
No. GeForce cards started off in the thousands, then went into the hundreds. So the 410m is far superior to the 8800gt, as is the latest card, the GTX 670.
The GTS 250 is better than the 9800 GT low end. Mid and high grade 9800 equal out with the 250 but the high end 250( or just go with a 260) beat the 9800 full out.The GeForce GTS 250 should in theory be a bit faster (18%) than the GeForce 9800 GT in general.The GeForce GTS 250 is quite a bit (more or less 29%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce 9800 GT.
I've tried it with games such as COD5 and others and can say 8400 is not as powerful but looks better 7600 can handle more so is better for games
Yes.. if you look at the specifications of the cards themselves, you'll find the GT graphics card series are always better when the number is in the hundreds.
A 9600GSO is will play games better than a 9500GT
No, the Geforce GTX 480 should beat the GTX 295 statistically speaking (although they are close in performance): Geforce GTX 295: -Core Clock: 576 MHz -Shader Clock: 1242 MHz -Memory Clock: 1000 MHz -Processing Cores: 480 Geforce GTX 480: -Core Clock: 700 MHz -Shader Clock: 1401 MHz -Memory Clock: 1848 MHz -Processing Cores: 480