No.
The Nikon D200 is great for everyday quick shots, as well as action shots thanks to the fast auto-changing ISOs and auto contrast features. It is also built with tougher material making it better for everyday use than other cameras in the same price and quality category.
Nikon Coolpix L310 is better than L610.
It will mount fine, and the matrix metering will work. However, you'll only be able to manually focus. The D5000 does not have a focusing motor in the body, and the tokina lens has no internal motor of its own. If you don't mind manually focusing, it's not a problem, but not having AF might suck for sports, concerts, and things that move.
This is a partially a matter of opinion, but I had to research this recently so I will dare to answer. Of course it depends what you mean by best. Best price? Best performance? Combination of the two? I will assume you mean best performance and quality, ignoring price, otherwise it becomes way too complicated. This is what I came up with as of this date January 19, 2008Best point and shoot small cameras: Nikon coolpix s700, 12.1 megapixels, Canon PowerShot SD870. 8 megapixels. Nikon coolpix p5100. 12.1 megapixels, Panasonic Lumix DMC-Tz3, 7.2 megapixels. Sony Cyber shot DSC-T200, 8.1 megapixels Best Advanced Amateur Cameras (does not have full sized professional sensor): Nikon D300, - best image quality of all, but the Sony A700 is the highest quality of build Sony A700 - but no live view - better built than the Nikon D300, but the Nikon takes slightly better pictures overall, however, both have their advantages Best Professional Digital camera: (full sized professional sensor) Nikon D3 - and it costs 3 times the price of the Nikon D300
Personally I think that Nikon is better than Canon, and it may be because I started out on a Nikon and have been on one ever since... but I truly believe that Nikon has a better quality and that it will last you much longer.
Nikon lenses are all interchangable on anhy of their slrs.
they are better than a nikon
I personally, like nikon d60 more than 400d
I use a canon 7D and have seen that the clarity of a picture is same as taken on a Nikon D90. However, it depends upon how one looks at a camera and a photo taken from a photografer's point of view. To me canon is better than a nikon...
It depends on your preference. Canon is much more popular in the SLR space than Nikon, but Nikon users swear by their lenses.
Yes, absolutely...It is far more stable and produces better images...
In essence, Nikon is the name of the big corporation that makes cameras, lenses, etc. The lenses made by Nikon are, generally, somewhat mass produced and are of a lesser quality than their Nikkor lense division. Nikkor lenses are of better quality than the parent Nikon lenses. You will pay more as a result. That said, Nikon still produces quality lenses.