I would think that b-2 is better then b-52
be more specific in b2. If you mean b2 as in stealth bomber then, the b stands for "bomber" bomber 2
A tactical bomber, like a A10 or B2 would support ground troops, dropping their bombs with relative accuracy on enemy structures like artillery guns. A stagetic bomber, like a B52 would attack on factories and other important targets.
Pilots of the USAF flew the B2 bomber. They were not sold to any other countries.
The B2 is nowhere near the size or weight of an airbus. It is smaller in every respect.
Pilots of the USAF flew the B2 bomber. They were not sold to any other countries.
For FY 2008 The B2 bomber's estimated cost is Approx. 2.2billion dollars each.
Yes
The B-2. Answer: There is, as yet, no B-3 bomber. Although once it is built (assuming that the next bomber to enter USAF service is designated B-3) it should, by definition, be better (for a given value of "better") than the B-2. Otherwise it wouldn't get built.
in america
1989
The F-4 Phantom is faster than the B-2 Spirit.
The B2 has an unrefuelled range of 6,900 but can be refuelled in flight.