Yes by a long shot.
Yes, the Bubonic plague whad hit an epidemic before 1564 and was winding down by 1616.
Bubonic and septicemic plague are two of the three types of plague. The main difference between the two is that the bubonic plague cause extreme infection and swelling of the lymph nodes while the septicemic plague cause the body's clotting mechanism to stop.
Today, when people say the plague as in a disease, they generally mean the bubonic plague. However, there are three types of plague: - bubonic - the kind with the swollen lymph nodes called buboes, that's where the name comes from - pneumonic - this is transmitted by coughing and people usually die within 2 days of showing symptoms - septicemic, which is in your blood and causes tissue to die. Pneumonic is far more contageous and kills quicker than the other two, so that's arguably the worst. If you mean the Plague as in the big pandemic that wiped out 1/3 of Europe in the 1350s, it was a mixture of bubonic and pneumonic.
Yes - it affected virtually the whole of Europe.
true
One type is from a bite of a flea that carries the disease. The spot where the person is bitten turns black and forms a pustule. The other type was carried by the air and came from a cough of an infected person ( like the flu). The people who got the plague this way died faster than the people with the bite.
Cancer, lukemia, scarlet fever, bubonic plague, rabies, there are lots more.
Not definitely, but there is a good chance without medical help that the victim will more than likely die.
super AIDS and turbo ghonneria
They are different names for the same thing.
Between 1 and 6 days. The pneumonic form (caught from droplets in breath rather than from fleabite) can be even faster.
Real bad. It's even worse than Aids or cancer.