There are two ways a model can be wrong. The first is if the author makes a mistake in solving it and deduces incorrect implications. In this sense the original Hotelling model was wrong, because Hotelling deduces a "principle of minimum differentiation" from it. In the 1970's using game theory economists proved that with simple linear costs, there is no pure Nash equilibrium. Furthermore, with quadratic transportation costs, firms instead differentiate as much as they can in order to weaken price competition.
The second way in which a model can be wrong is if it fails to reflect reality. Since there is no clear prediction coming out of the literature, it is hard to assess in this case (a problem with economics in general!).
Harold Hotelling died on 1973-12-26.
Harold Hotelling was born on 1895-09-29.
Harold Hotelling has written: 'Three-dimensional manifolds of states of motion'
Kirstin Hotelling Zona has written: 'Marianne Moore, Elizabeth Bishop, and May Swenson' -- subject(s): American Feminist poetry, American poetry, Criticism and interpretation, Feminism and literature, History, History and criticism, Self-control in literature, Women and literature, Women authors
there is no pdf in hottling t sq test there is only mdf or it has multivariate distribution function
Archille Joseph Laferriere has written: 'A comparison of Thurstone's centroid method of factor analysis with Hotelling's method of principal components'
they are not identical. Dalton's model was wrong.
Someone answer this
Someone answer this
It all depends on the model and what is wrong with it.
They go to the wrong road and the have to create a new model.
It was proven wrong because that they were eclipse and change of seaon.