yes
Rome has very bad land and his has very ugly land too. Rome is the ugliest land form in the world1
All of the above. The ancient Romans colonized the area because of its fertility. And it was also very rocky ground
Near the mountains it would be quite rocky and hilly, but this was an advantage, due to all the raw materials that could be found in that type of land. In the cities, it was relatively flat, but not very in Rome due to the Seven Hills. By the coast there would have been many cliffs and caves.
The land is very flat and also very fertile.
Both. Not kidding -flat in the southwest and and very mountainous some places.
Appalachian mountains
A plain is an area of land that is very flat. A plateau is an elevated piece of land that is flat on top and surrounded by lower areas of land, usually valleys.
it was very large and dry dont ask me again
Orlando, Florida is mostly flat with very few hills. The terrain is generally low-lying and characterized by its flat topography.
Rome has very fertile farming land so conqoring it would bring riches to it's conqourer
It is very hot and the land is just about flat with a lot of parks and trees
no, it is very hilly, buthas decent-ish farming soil.