according to Wikipedia "Jesus and the woman taken in adultery", "most scholars agree that it was not part of the original text of John's Gospel."
The story of the woman caught in adultery and saved by Jesus is not found in the oldest manuscripts of the Bible. It is believed to have been added to the Gospel of John at a later date. Many scholars view it as a powerful story that captures the essence of Jesus' teachings on forgiveness and mercy, regardless of its originality.
adultery at first...then it later stood for able
As a moral issue, adultery is always wrong.
No Stephen was not a apostle of Jesus Christ.He joined the apostles later on.
Judas of maccabees betrayed Jesus for money and later he hanged himself because Jesus christ was inocecent.
Jesus rose three days later!
Let memake a point clear Jesus was a jewish man. Christianity came much later after Jesus died and even arose from the cross. Christianity was started mainly by Paul later on.
Henry VIII's fifth wife was Catherine Howard, who was later beheaded for adultery.
John 8.2-11 tells the story of how Jesus saved from being stoned a woman caught in adultery, but does not mention her name. The story appears in different places in some old manuscripts but does not occur in any manuscript prior to the end of the fourth century. If the author of John's Gospel was not really the author of this passage, we have reason to doubt whether it really happened at all, or whether the woman really existed. Perhaps the passage was intended to provide moral guidance for later generations.
Saul, later known as Paul, was from Tarsus, a city in modern-day Turkey. He was a Roman citizen, a Jew, and a prominent figure in the early Christian church.
No the early people who followed Jesus were called followers, they changed it later on.
Simon was no blood relation to Jesus. Jesus simply chose him to be His disciple, and later gave him his new surname, Peter, (Mark 3.16).