yes for sure more work needs to get done.
To document the findings or document that there were no findings or that they were in conclusive
Joe Miller has written: 'Funny you should ask'
Research should be done whenever information is needed.
There is no conclusive proof that talking on a mobile phone is unsafe.
Indirect evidence should be used when you don't have direct or conclusive proof of a particular fact or conclusion but have supporting information that implies it. It can help build a stronger case or argument when direct evidence is lacking or ambiguous. Indirect evidence can be particularly useful in investigations, historical research, and scientific inquiries.
Basil Miller.
Music
amvot ninu ui''''''''//////...
Published papers should be conclusive in all aspects. Inconclusive paper might be not worthy for the reader which gives only the problems.
Published papers should be conclusive in all aspects. Inconclusive paper might be not worthy for the reader which gives only the problems.
Depending on the type of research; If the research is painful and inhumane I'd say no animals should be used. If the research is just to keep the animal and study it without pain, I'd say almost any animal.
why not