yeah you idiot
The military and the army are the same thing!!!The military and the army are the same thing!!!The military and the army are the same thing!!!The military and the army are the same thing!!!The military and the army are the same thing!!!The military and the army are the same thing!!!The military and the army are the same thing!!!The military and the army are the same thing!!!The military and the army are the same thing!!!
no. the roman cavalry was a horse-riding division of the roman army. roman catholicism is the first form of christianity.
The military power in the Roman republic was the same as it had always been -- the Roman army. Whoever led the army, or at least a few legions, could hope for supreme power if he wanted it. Men such as Marius, Sulla, Pompey and Caesar used their legions to gain power.
Military has different branches like Army and Navy and the Army is one branch of the military.
The Byzantine army did not have centurions and legions in the same way as the Roman army. Instead, it evolved into a different structure, with units like the "tagmata" and "thematic" armies, which were organized around local defense and professional soldiers. While the Byzantine military retained some Roman traditions and terminology, it adapted to the changing needs of warfare and the empire's diverse population. Centurions, as officers of a Roman legion, were specific to the Roman military system, which had largely transformed by the time of the Byzantine Empire.
Roman military highways are the same as the main Roman roads. Remember that the reason the Romans built their roads in the first place was for the military, plus the military men were the ones who constructed the roads.
They didn't. They are the same thing.
A quaestor in the Roman army could loosely be called an assistant to the legate of the legion. He wore the same uniform as the rest of the men.A quaestor in the Roman army could loosely be called an assistant to the legate of the legion. He wore the same uniform as the rest of the men.A quaestor in the Roman army could loosely be called an assistant to the legate of the legion. He wore the same uniform as the rest of the men.A quaestor in the Roman army could loosely be called an assistant to the legate of the legion. He wore the same uniform as the rest of the men.A quaestor in the Roman army could loosely be called an assistant to the legate of the legion. He wore the same uniform as the rest of the men.A quaestor in the Roman army could loosely be called an assistant to the legate of the legion. He wore the same uniform as the rest of the men.A quaestor in the Roman army could loosely be called an assistant to the legate of the legion. He wore the same uniform as the rest of the men.A quaestor in the Roman army could loosely be called an assistant to the legate of the legion. He wore the same uniform as the rest of the men.A quaestor in the Roman army could loosely be called an assistant to the legate of the legion. He wore the same uniform as the rest of the men.
They are the same thing.
Master-at-Arms in the Navy are responsible for discipline and law enforcement. There are no MP's in the Navy; the Army's Military Police Corps are largely responsible for the same thing in the Army.
Roman numerals have the same numerical values as in civilian life and so it follows that the Army's usage of them makes no difference.
What would you want them to do, rush into battle in togas? The Roman army wore their equipment for the same reasons that our moderns soldiers were their equipment, protection.What would you want them to do, rush into battle in togas? The Roman army wore their equipment for the same reasons that our moderns soldiers were their equipment, protection.What would you want them to do, rush into battle in togas? The Roman army wore their equipment for the same reasons that our moderns soldiers were their equipment, protection.What would you want them to do, rush into battle in togas? The Roman army wore their equipment for the same reasons that our moderns soldiers were their equipment, protection.What would you want them to do, rush into battle in togas? The Roman army wore their equipment for the same reasons that our moderns soldiers were their equipment, protection.What would you want them to do, rush into battle in togas? The Roman army wore their equipment for the same reasons that our moderns soldiers were their equipment, protection.What would you want them to do, rush into battle in togas? The Roman army wore their equipment for the same reasons that our moderns soldiers were their equipment, protection.What would you want them to do, rush into battle in togas? The Roman army wore their equipment for the same reasons that our moderns soldiers were their equipment, protection.What would you want them to do, rush into battle in togas? The Roman army wore their equipment for the same reasons that our moderns soldiers were their equipment, protection.