Italics
Before we had italics, it had to be quotation marks, but now, I think italics is sufficient, particularly if you are referring to it as a source. Maybe different rules for published treatises.
No. Just make sure the title is very clearly separated from the text.
Answer this question… In quotation marks
No. It should be in italics like a book title. You can indicate italics by underlining.
The title of a book or movie is always separated from the main text by italics. In some cases the title will also be in quotation marks.
Yes, I believe so. If not, you only need to put it into italics.
Well, it doesn't need quotation marks but it does have to be capitalized and it has to be in italics. If it's a name of the article in a magazine, then you have to underline it too. That's what I think.
To introduce an article title in an essay effectively, you can use quotation marks or italics to set it apart from the rest of the text. Additionally, provide context or a brief summary of the article to give readers an idea of what to expect.
Italics or underling should be used for the titles of books, series of books, titles of periodicals and for titles of films. (Many schools and colleges prefer underling). Titles of short stories, poems and articles should be placed in quotation marks.
One example of when it is appropriate to use both italics and "quotation marks" in writing is when you are citing the title of a book or a play within a sentence. For instance, you would write: She enjoyed reading Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare.
Surround the song title with quote marks, like "The Sound of Music," or you can use italics like The Sound of Music.
The general rule is that one should use quotation marks for short forms (short stories, lyrics, one-act plays) and underlining (or italics) for long forms (novels, epics, full-length dramas).