That is entirely dependent on what you're measuring. Kilometers is a good measurement for long distances. However, shorter distances are better measured using meters, centimeters, or even smaller depending on the exact size of the distance.
Plus, of course, kilometers are an absolutely worthless measurement for anything besides distance such as volume, work, or electric charge, and measurements that actually apply to those properties are obviously better.
Given that 4987 metres is a more precise unit of measurement than 5 kilometres, you could argue that it would take more skill to walk exactly 4987 metres than it would to cover an approximate measurement of 5 kilometres.
They aren't relevant units of measurement you boob.
You cannot convert ounces to kilometers. Ounces are a measurement of weight. Kilometers are a measurement of distance.
If you mean meters, and not liters, neither is greater. 740 meters is 0.74 kilometers. They're equal. If you did mean liters, which is a volume measurement, it's hard to speak of one being greater than the other since kilometers is a length measurement.
"Kilometers" is a measurement scale (one I kilometer = 1000 meters) not a distance. To make it a distance you have to say how many kilometers you are asking about. For instance 10 kilometers is longer than 5 kilometers.
No, 2.07 kilometers is longer than 2.063 kilometers. When comparing two numbers, the number with the larger value is considered longer. In this case, 2.07 is larger than 2.063 because the extra digit after the decimal point represents a smaller unit of measurement.
There is not one Milligram is a tiny measurement of weight Kilometers is a measurement of distance.
length / distance
Hours are a measurement of time, kilometers are a measurement of distance. Do not try to work this out, it will not work.
No, hectares and square kilometers are both units of area measurement. 1 hectare is equal to 0.01 square kilometers.
50 000 metres is a larger measurement than 5 km.50 000 m = 50 km.
kilometers are greater