Yes, it provides cleaner more efficiient energy
This is a matter of opinion. Currently I do not live in the UK. However, There are potentials and dangers of Nuclear Power. If there is a scarcity of electricity and the population trends are rising you may need to add some more power to your local grids.
Yes, because nuclear power stations induce energy from a nucleus. That nucleus being from the most common element called Uranium. Unlike power plants that burn coal which is a fossil fuel which leads to globabl warming.... Nuclear power stations dont BURN anything. they just establish nucleuses in a 'chain reaction'. where more and more nucleuses mutate and doubles and doubles whilst giving out TONS of energy. nuclear is a clean process. But it is extremely expensive to build and it would take a long time to make the nuclear reactor and apparatus... they need to be patient. :)
Most industrialised countries and some emerging ones are asking this, and the answer is generally yes. Nuclear stations have the advantage of not producing greenhouse gases.
Yes, the argument is over what type to build
yes because you need energy to live and the scients couldn't find any other waysinsted f the nuclear power station
Because, if they aren't, the excess heat will damage the reactor.
Nuclear power stations produce electricity with lower greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuels, reducing the impact on global warming. Additionally, nuclear power generates a significant amount of energy from a small amount of fuel, increasing efficiency and reducing the need for resource extraction.
no because they should find different ways to suply power no because they should find different ways to suply power
You don't need nuclear power, energy can be generated using other methods, fossil fuels, hydro-electric etc. However nuclear power does reduce a countries reliance on fossil fuel, which can be particularly important for countries with few fossil fuel reserves of their own. Nuclear power stations do not release CO2 into the atmosphere so do not directly contribute to global warming. Many countries are looking at an investment in nuclear power to help meet CO2 emissions targets. Nuclear power stations are also required to make plutonium for nuclear weapons. Plutonium does not occur naturally and can only be made from uranium in nuclear reactors. Any country with a nuclear weapons program will have a civilian nuclear power industry for this reason.
It will do soon, as old stations are retired
West London gets its electricity supply from various power stations located across the UK, connected through the National Grid. Some of the power stations that contribute to the electricity supply in this area include gas-fired power stations, nuclear power plants, and renewable energy sources such as wind and solar farms.
We are all used to "power on demand" which means when we do something that includes electricity, we expect something to happen. We can use "unreliable sources" such as wind turbines etc but just in case that plan doesn't come into place, we should have something else that will generate our electricity (a nuclear power station.) Governments need to do this!Nuclear power is currently the only meaningful technology that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Unlike, for example, solar power where the energy investment equation can be negative when looking at the environmental impact. Until people are ready to give up dishwashers, washing machines and all the other labor saving devices then nuclear power is essential.There are many arguements for and against nuclear power. The UK relies on nuclear power for 20% of its electricity. It dominates in some countries (78% in France). Although there are many concerns about safely displosing of it. Renewable energy is an alternative to nuclear power.AIn my opinion yesAbut in what way would the UK need more power stations i no that 20% of the UK`s electricity is nuclear produced but it can cause very harmful affects on som people and in sellafeild a small village near the power stations children were 78% more likely to get leaukemia.