No. Toxic rain happens when hazardous chemicals are turned into gas, which collects in the air. When it rains, the water washes the chemicals out of the air and brings them back to earth in the form of Acid rain. The chemicals usually get into the air as a result of materials being burned and not from the evaporation of polluted water.
as far as I know, the oil spill has not reached the eastern side of Florida. Only cities near the gulf of Mexico have a risk, and daytona beach is on the Atlantic side.
Yes, sea turtles [superfamily Chenolioidea] are dying because of the Mexican Gulf oil spill of April 20, 2010. They're found in all of the world's oceans except the Arctic. But nowadays, they're considered one of the ten [10] animals most at risk from the recent disaster in the Mexican Gulf.
Transporting spent nuclear fuel poses a greater environmental threat compared to transporting toxic chemicals, mainly due to the potential for radioactive contamination in case of a spill or accident. Spent nuclear fuel can have long-lasting environmental impacts and poses a risk to human health, whereas toxic chemicals are generally easier to contain and clean up in the event of a spill.
Yes, the Exxon Valdez oil spill is linked to biomagnification. The spill released a significant amount of oil into the ecosystem, which resulted in the contamination of marine organisms. Through biomagnification, the toxic compounds in the oil can accumulate and become more concentrated as they move up the food chain, posing a greater risk to predators at higher trophic levels.
If there was a oil spill the entire ocean ecosystem would be at risk.
For the east coast to be affected, the oil spill would have to move hundreds of miles to the south, and once around the tip of Florida, move north again. I don't want to be a spill forecaster- but this appears to be a very unlikely event as the blob is moving slowly eastward and not much to the south. The size of the spill might actually contract as efforts are made to contain it. The panhandle region of Florida is at risk and sea birds will likely suffer as a result.
Toxic Effects,Risk to People,Risk to Wildlife
Certain medications (particularly those that diminish intestinal contractions) may increase risk of toxic megacolon, but this interaction is unclear.
Ammonium nitrate can degrade and release toxic gases when exposed to high temperatures or moisture. Storing it in a ventilated area helps to disperse these gases and reduce the risk of an explosion. Ventilation also helps to prevent the accumulation of ammonia vapors, which can be harmful to human health.
The xanthene dye is considered to be toxic. This dye has been studied and it has been found that the risk is very minor.
reduces risk of toxic reaction, and helps control bleeding
It was a learning experience. The investigations are still ongoing and the conclusions of what changes are needed to prevent future accidents are likely to be controversal. For some, the oil spill shows that there are places too close to environmentally sensitive areas to risk drilling wells. However, others consider that the lesson learned will be better engineering practices and additional preparedness if accidents occur. BP's investigation identified that the cement used was incorrectly formulated for the conditions in the well. I believe there will be more discussion of changes in engineering practices when the Marine Board concludes their investigation in Jan 2011. The major oil companies operating in the gulf coast region have developed a joint organization that will have equipment ready to respond to spills in the Gulf of Mexico. BP has pledged 500 million dollars to study the effects of oil spills on the marine environment of the Gulf of Mexico, to independent researchers typically from Universities. Finally, an oil spill can never be considered "beneficial" , but there are some positive efforts as a result of the disaster. See related links.