Absolutely. When you look at Starcraft 1 and Starcraft 2 side by side, it looks like Starcraft 2 is modern day while Starcraft 1 is from the dinosaur ages. Blizzard Entertainment made sure that Starcraft 2 had a major graphics improvement.
The difference is in perminance in case of Microfilm Image-More than 500 years but in case of digital image the media does not exist no longer than 15 or 20 years only. The cost of doing microfilm image is much more the cost of doing digital image.
Digital image is depending on the camera resolotion, where optical image depends on the quality of the film. Normally an optical image will be better then a digital image, unless you are using high end digital camera. I hope this helps, Icko www.rtgallery.com
A quality photography contains a meaningful content, good image quality (image sharpness etc, and a good composition.
Mega pixzal
Pixel density. The greater the density, the higher the quality of the image.
A JPEG image loses quality when it is opened and resaved due the compression algorithms. The more an image is opened and resaved, the more the quality can degrade. An image on a disc will not lose quality unless you resave it on a CD-RW. Opening an image to print will not affect the quality.
By reducing the size if a image
recognition and loyalty image of size image quality
binlear
It refers to how "crisp" or clear and image / the quality of an image is.
Owning an image or the copyright to an image are the same thing. When you hold the copyright to an image it is yours to do with whatever you will, and you can decide who has permission to use it or not. There is no difference.
Image quality, sometimes called clarity, in photography is a term which often is used to describe the amount of visibility of pertinent information in an image. When judging image quality in a photograph or on a monitor we may look at sharpness or resolution, good contrast, correctness of color, gradation from black to white with what is sometimes called "long scale," and other criteria. By definition, image quality may tend to exclude such potentially image degrading impediments such as grain or noise, halation, fog or anything else that at least theoretically reduces or obscures the pertinent information in the image. Image quality can, however, be subjective.