there is probably proof that there was a man named Jesus, now there is no proof that he was the son of god, or anything else cause there is no proof that god is real. so take it for what its worth, it all matters on what you believe
Another Answer
I believe God is real, and Jesus is real too. But you shouldn't only believe in Him because of proof. But, there is the shroud. When Jesus died, He was wrapped up in burial cloth. When the people came back, Jesus's body was gone. But his cloth remained in still wrapped, but with nothing inside it. They unraveled it, and they saw an imprint of His face in the cloth. Even today, because His face was so holy, the shroud has not rotted. This is just one of the many, many evidences of God and Jesus.
AnswerThere is no evidence outside the gospels for the existence of Mary, mother of Jesus. Even Paul does not mention her in any of his epistles. If Jesus really did exist, he must have had a mother, and Mary was a common name in Judea of the first century BCE. Other than that, it is a matter of faith alone.
AnswerNo, it is not fear - it is being rational. Since there is no evidence for the existence of God, it follows that there is no evidence that Jesus is the son of God, and no evidence that he can save us from a hell, the existence of which is purely conjecture.
Yes! In the Vatican with the rest of biblical evidence that prove that Jesus was a man and a prophet.
Just as there is no evidence for the existence of God, so there is no evidence for the existence of the Holy Ghost. It is a matter of faith, and faith alone.
There is no scientific evidence to support the existence of near-death experiences involving encounters with Jesus.
There is no extra-biblical evidence that Jesus ascended to heaven.
Unfortunately, the only evidence we have outside of the Bible for any of the actions of Jesus, or even his existence (aside from a line inserted into the writings of the Jewish historian Josephus, probably by a later Christian) is heresay. Some testimony comes from people who supposedly saw Jesus, but this was reported long after their death by various early writers in the church. One such individual was supposedly named Papias. As far as physical evidence, or any writings from that time or immediately after, there is none, and we have to trust the Biblical texts.
Is there any evidence of the existence of Julius Casear? Only a partial volume of history books on Julius Casear has survived from his time.What kind of evidence do you want to see? There is no photograph. There is no body. Some claim to have items, which are called relics, of his crucifixtion.AnswerThe evidence is in the reliable book called the Bible, particularly the New Testament, recorded by people, many of whom were direct eyewitnesses of Jesus. Others who were not believers also recorded the fact that He existed, although of course they did not believe in Him.According to J P Holding, no serious historian denies His existence today, since there is more evidence for Jesus' existence than for many other ancient personages, whom no-one denies existed.
There has been evidence of ghosts but i do not believe that they are any serious threat.
The New Testament
No. The gospel accounts of Jesus' birth do no mention any season.
It is easier to deal first with Adam and Eve, as they clearly were not real. Not only is there no evidence for their existence, the scientific and historical evidence we do have is contrary to their existence.Whether Jesus was real can be broken down into two separate questions. First, did Jesus exist? Second, did Jesus perform miracles and was he the son of God?The existence of the gospels does not resolve these issues. However, most historians assume that Jesus probably did live some time around the first century CE, although there is no evidence for him. There is no reason to believe he performed miracles and no reason to believe he was the son of God.