The romans went to England because when they had the war with queen Boadicea, the Celtic queen. In that time the Celtic people lived in what is now called England. In the end the romans won because of their advantages such as their spears, the roman cavalry, and the formation of the roman foot soldiers. Also the romans built buildings and roads such as the huge wall they built across northern England.
There is no evidence of any Roman settlement at Durham or of any Roman name for the place. Continuous settlement is relatively recent, dating from AD995.
No; they did not think that there was any evidence of 'weapons of mass destruction' inside Iraq; which was the only reason for invading Iraq. As it turned out later, they were right.
antigen
he did not do any thing
The Romans. They managed to get a third of the known world under their control and influence at their peak, and apart from minor exceptions never lost a battle. America doesn't have anywhere near the same control (most of its land taken only because nobody was there to stop them) and hasn't managed to win any significant wars without help.
white blood cells
There are not any.
There is no firsthand evidence in any historical content. This is one of those historical items that cannot be proven and can only be believed or not based on writing of scribes in the time period.
The Romans arrived in 43CE and there is no strong evidence of any continued occupation before this time. So with some accuracy, it's just less than 2,000 years old.
No, the Romans were not the first people to travel to the American continent. While they were advanced in many ways, there is no historical evidence to suggest that Romans reached the Americas. The first known arrivals were the Norse, led by Leif Erikson around the year 1000, and indigenous peoples had been living in the Americas for thousands of years prior to any European contact.
I don't see any evidence of this; the Romans executed him and his followers so I think it was the other way around. I don't remember anything about him hating Greeks. ---- A Catholic Answer Jesus was man like us in all things but sin. And we know that to hate anyone is a terrible sin. Therefore, we may be certain that Jesus hated no one. He was no more capable of hating the Romans or Greeks than he was of commiting any other sin.
Yes, the Romans had allies but they never conquered the Persians.