Want this question answered?
Any evidence is archived and stored in case it is needed in the future.
evidence
No
The evidence was circumstantial and not enough to prove any guilt.
It is important to question if one has gathered any scientific evidence or not so that they can be sure that the person is not just making something up and sharing it to the world. This is the reason that it is important to question scientific evidence. ~Nightelf93
The English language has not really had any trouble managing to survive. Because of the British Empire, the English language was spread across the world.
B,c he was in da country Gutenberg was German. There is no evidence that he had any interest in English. [This first answer should be excised.]
No. Because they would laugh at me and tell me they don't have enough evidence. Besides I wouldn't want to get in any more trouble.
There is not one shred of evidence that Einstein had any difficulty with spelling in German. He did have trouble learning languages, and noted (in his 50s) that writing in English was a problem for him because of it's changeable spelling * rules -- a problem for just about any adult learning English. But Einstein had absolutely no difficulty with writing German, his native tongue. * Quick -- which of the three words prior to the * were intentionally misspelled or misused?
I could not find evidence of a company that does English training via mail. Your best bet is to attend a class.
If you are having trouble in English class a good place to go would be www.ucranesummaries.com <------ Just about any book, has a summary here.
Robert Frost was primarily an English-speaking poet and writer. While he may have had some knowledge of other languages, there is no evidence to suggest that he was fluent in any language other than English.
There is no verifiable evidence of psychic powers of any kind.
Michael is not in any trouble what so ever!
No
Vestigial structures are considered evidence, but no more critical than any other line of evidence in Biology and palaeontology. They're considered evidence, not because of their function, but because of the way their morphologies follow the nested hierarchies of biology: the vestigial legs of whales, for instance, have exactly the kind of shape we would have expected them to have if whales had descended from land mammals. The same goes for human tailbones and embryonic branchial ridges, the wings of emus, and so on.
If you know it was stolen, yes, you can get in trouble. If you didn't know it was stolen, you will not get into any trouble.