Smalltalk, for one.
Not necessarily. Any language with an object-oriented approach will be a high-level language, but a high-level language does not have to use an object-oriented approach.
It depends on which language to you , is "Not" completely Object Oriented. To us PHP is a server scripting language like any other language ASP,CGI,PERL each. Orientation is the views of the users of the engines. It is not the view at the point of source or origin.
When a programming language is "object-oriented" it means that the code is based (or oriented) around Objects as opposed to executing line by line. An object is any value, variable, function, or data structure.
I think there is no any difference between object oriented programming language. Because somebody have written that vb is object based language because there is no inheritance, but javascript has no classes and no inheritance but javascript is also object oriented scripting language and java is also object oriented language vb has no inheritance but classes is.So vb is object based language This is not clear that difference between object oriented and object based. if i am wrong than what should be your answer and if i am wright than no problem But first i am requesting to the developer of any programming language that please define the difference between object oriented and object based languages. Amit Sinha Dist-Gaya State-Bihar
The languages C# and Ruby are notable for their pure object oriented design. You can even call instance functions on literals, such as 10.to_s (Ruby) or 10.ToString() (C#). Other object-oriented designs tend to treat primitives as non-objects, such as in Java, and are therefore not technically "100%" object-oriented.
java is a object oriented langage,that is indepentant platform. java is full object oriented language. java is access any operating system.so java is good certification of program in runtime environment.
A "pure object oriented language" is one where every thing in it is treated on a consistent basis as on object, including elementary data types such as an integer. Since C++ treats elementary objects differently than classes, it does not meet the formal definition as a "pure ...".
No, it is not strictly object oriented. Java still maintains the concept of primitive data types, such as char, int, long, float, double, boolean. And as such, these are not objects. In a true object oriented language, everything would be represented as an object, including operators. sory but wappers implement this concept n everything in java done by a class n a object it strickly follow the 3 rules of oops for detail refers java2 complete reference chapter2
Yes, java is a pure object oriented program because it derives its syntax from C and object oriented features from C++. Moreover its a platform independent language which means it can be run any where any time in any environment.Thus, it's appropriate to say java is a pure OOP.
An instance in VBNet is the same as an instance in any other language; it is the realisation of a type. In object-oriented languages, like VBNet, we say that an object is an instance of a class, where the class defines the object's type.
An instance in VBNet is the same as an instance in any other language; it is the realisation of a type. In object-oriented languages, like VBNet, we say that an object is an instance of a class, where the class defines the object's type.
OOP stands for Object Oriented Programming. Everything in Java is an Object. Any class you create extends the Object class by default thereby making everything in Java an object. Moreover, you can use features like Inheritance, Polymorphism, Encapsulation etc which are OOP concepts thereby making Java an Object Oriented Programming Language