no
They did not have any certain religion except they were polytheistic.
As Assyria no longer exists there is no religion. However as Assyria pre-dates any monotheistic religion it is safe to assume they had multiple gods
Assyria's military power and well-organized government helped conquer a vast empire in Mesopotamia by 650 BC. It did not hurt that there was already a substantial population in Mesopotamia who could be harnessed both for their agricultural ability, but also to be draft soldiers in the Assyrian Army.
No there isn't any lasting effects
YES. The fact that most of western South America is Spanish-speaking countries directly tracks to Pizarro's conquest of the Inca Empire.
Diocletian was only a successful emperor due to the fact that he was the only emperor to retire and leave office alive. His splitting of the empire and price controls certainly did not bring about any lasting benefits.Diocletian was only a successful emperor due to the fact that he was the only emperor to retire and leave office alive. His splitting of the empire and price controls certainly did not bring about any lasting benefits.Diocletian was only a successful emperor due to the fact that he was the only emperor to retire and leave office alive. His splitting of the empire and price controls certainly did not bring about any lasting benefits.Diocletian was only a successful emperor due to the fact that he was the only emperor to retire and leave office alive. His splitting of the empire and price controls certainly did not bring about any lasting benefits.Diocletian was only a successful emperor due to the fact that he was the only emperor to retire and leave office alive. His splitting of the empire and price controls certainly did not bring about any lasting benefits.Diocletian was only a successful emperor due to the fact that he was the only emperor to retire and leave office alive. His splitting of the empire and price controls certainly did not bring about any lasting benefits.Diocletian was only a successful emperor due to the fact that he was the only emperor to retire and leave office alive. His splitting of the empire and price controls certainly did not bring about any lasting benefits.Diocletian was only a successful emperor due to the fact that he was the only emperor to retire and leave office alive. His splitting of the empire and price controls certainly did not bring about any lasting benefits.Diocletian was only a successful emperor due to the fact that he was the only emperor to retire and leave office alive. His splitting of the empire and price controls certainly did not bring about any lasting benefits.
Its not in any empire. Its a republic.
Palladio's influence outside Italy, most significantly in England and in colonial America was stronger and more lasting than that of any other architect.
Montesquieu's most lasting political thought is his idea of the separation of powers, which suggests the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to prevent any one group from having too much power. This concept has had a significant influence on the structure of modern democratic governments around the world.
Yes.
The Roman empire was never completely surrounded by any body of water.The Roman empire was never completely surrounded by any body of water.The Roman empire was never completely surrounded by any body of water.The Roman empire was never completely surrounded by any body of water.The Roman empire was never completely surrounded by any body of water.The Roman empire was never completely surrounded by any body of water.The Roman empire was never completely surrounded by any body of water.The Roman empire was never completely surrounded by any body of water.The Roman empire was never completely surrounded by any body of water.
yes