There is no extra-biblical proof of the historicity of the disciple Matthew. Scholars say that the Gospel According to St Matthew was not attributed to the disciple Matthew until the middle of the second century. The reasoning of the Church Fathers was that the Gospel must have been written by an eyewitness to the events in the life of Jesus, and they felt that internal clues in the Gospel pointed to Matthew. However, we now know that Matthew used Mark's Gospel as his primary source on the life of Jesus, somthing that a real eyewitness would not have needed to do.
There is limited external evidence for the historicity of John the Apostle from sources such as early Christian writers like Polycarp and Ignatius. Inscriptions of John's name have also been found in ancient Christian contexts. However, due to the nature of ancient historical sources, conclusive proof of John's existence outside of the Bible is scarce.
There is no extra-biblical proof of the historicity of the disciple. Moreover, the Gospel known to us as the Gospel According to St Mark or St Mark's Gospel does not identify its author, and it was not until the second century that it was finally attributed by the Church Fathers to the Apostle Mark, thus giving this previously anonymous Gospel the name "Gospel According to St Mark". However, there is no real evidence to support that opinion, and considerable evidence to the contrary. The decision of the Church Fathers to attribute the Gospel to the apostle Mark was an admirable, but not necessarily correct one.
There is no verifiable proof of Paul being a Pharisee outside of the Bible. However, some scholars believe that Paul's writings reflect knowledge and understanding of Pharisaic traditions and theology, which may suggest that he had Pharisaic background or training.
Proof of the existence or otherwise of Jesus is something that will probably always remain outside the scope of science. Certainly, science has shown the Shroud of Turin to be a more recent artefact than many had hoped it to be, but that does not reflect on the historicity of Jesus.
proof of believe
The Bible.
I can only speak for myself and can not offer you any proof other than the Bible itself.
The standard bullet proof vest is not stab proof, however there are some bullet proof vests that are. These stab-proof vests have a wire mesh on the outside, or a similar material.
AnswerThere is no real proof of God's existence. People believe simply because the Bible says so.
It is outside. proof - That is where Rikki killed the other animal
Most people reject the fall (of man) because, to date, nobody has produced any evidence that would verify its historicity, and such a feat like that would have some proof of it happening.
It is because Christians are too close-minded to actually find proof of their god.We have all the proof we need... If you are on the outside in the dark, come on in...The Bible is like a huge dictionary/history/riddle book. In it is answers to most of your questions. Some may not be answered directly but instead answered in a story. It is true that some Christians don't know anything else and just say that to get away but it is also true that some people are true Christians and have found their anwers in the Bible. The main thing you must remember, though, is that the Bible is written in riddles so somethings may have more than one meaning.