While the traditional (Biblical) Gospels are considered by the majority of the world's fundamentalist christian scholars to be an accurately historical portrayal of Jesus of Nazereth; the apocryphal gospels, circa. 30 A.D. mediteranean' historians and Roman authorities' remaining manuscripts support the belief that Jesus of Nazareth existed.Not to say that the traditional Gospels are not trustworthy. However, If you do your research, regarding the non-christian traditional sources such as: The Apocryphal Gospels; Historian's and Roman authorities' surving and scholarly credible modern sources from antiquity; Then you will find through avid and persistent study that....Your average joe athiest, in this world, with a college education has not taken the time to seriously investigate all the, very convincing, credible sources from antiquity that are available at any local U.S. Library or at www.Amazon.com's kindle bookstore ;)The Apocryphal Gospels are, primarily, considered to have been written by Christians of the early 1st century. They were considered by ancient christian shcolars, circa. The Council of Nicea (300 A.D.), to have been heretical sources and were banished from the Canonization of, what now, is "The Holy Bible".
You can't people have tried but most scholars of antiquity agree Jesus existed. Various Christian and non-Christian sources are used to study and establish the historicity of Jesus. Jewish sources such as Josephus, a first-century Romano-Jewish scholar. Roman sources such as Tacitus, a senator and a historian of the Roman Empire. These different ources are compared and contrasted to Christian sources such as the Pauline Letters in the New Testament and the Synoptic Gospels. These sources are usually independent of each other (e.g. Jewish sources do not draw upon Roman sources), and similarities and differences between them are used in the authentication process
Jesus didn't say that because he wasn't a christian. Christians only existed after Jesus died. A christian is a follower of Christ. If Jesus was a christian that would mean he was a follower of himself.
The bible is the best source for information about the existence of Jesus.
The Jewish historian Josephus is one of the major sources of factual, historical information about Jesus.
Jesus Christ, The Apostles, The Holy Bible
No. Christian music were traditionally referred to as 'hymns.'
The historical documents referring to Christ's life and work may be divided into three classes: pagan sources, Jewish sources, and Christian sources.
The entire Christian religion depends upon the historical existence of Jesus. If the stories about his life are fictional, then the promises and admonitions of the New Testament are of no effect.
A variety of sources referring to the same event. If the source is antipathetic to the subject, that is a good indicator of its truth. For example, Josephus is not impressed by Jesus, which is an indication that the historical Jesus existed.
A christian IS a follower, of Jesus. it's not "a christian's follower" it's a christian follower (of jesus).
No
He never existed